IJETSI

Title: SLOW DOWN EFFECT OF DEBRIS EXTRUSION ON SINGLE-ROOTED TEETH
Authors: Carlos Alberto Luna Lara, Octavio Rangel Cobos, Saraí Telléz González, Jose Macario Hernández Izaguirre, Ives Alberto Turrubiartes Balderas & Oscar Miguel Hernandez Morato
\|\| \|\|
Carlos Alberto Luna Lara: Professor of the Dentistry Faculty, Autonomous University of Tamaulipas Octavio Rangel Cobos: Professor of the Dentistry Faculty, Autonomous University of Tamaulipas Saraí Telléz González: Professor of the Dentistry Faculty, Autonomous University of Tamaulipas Jose Macario Hernández Izaguirre: Professor of the Dentistry Faculty, Autonomous University of Tamaulipas Ives Alberto Turrubiartes Balderas: Professor of the Dentistry Faculty, Autonomous University of Tamaulipas Oscar Miguel Hernandez Morato: Professor of the Dentistry Faculty, Autonomous University of Tamaulipas

References [1] Bystrom A, Sundqvist G. The antibacterial action of sodium hypochlorite and EDTA in 60 cases of endodontic therapy. Int Endod J. 1985 Jan;18(1):35-40. [2] Schafer E, Schulzbongert U, Tulus G. Comparison of Hand Stainless Steel and Nickel Titanium Rotary Instrumentation: A Clinical Study. J Endod. 2004 Jun;30(6):432–5. [3] Plotino G, Grande NM, Cotti E, Testarelli L, Gambarini G. Blue Treatment Enhances Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Vortex Nickel-Titanium Rotary Files. J Endod. 2014 Sep;40(9):1451–3. [4] Cruz ATG, Wichnieski C, Carneiro E, da Silva Neto UX, Gambarini G, Piasecki L. Accuracy of 2 Endodontic Rotary Motors with Integrated Apex Locator. J Endod. 2017 Oct 1;43(10):1716–9. [5] Nekoofar MH, Ghandi MM, Hayes SJ, Dummer PMH. The fundamental operating principles of electronic root canal length measurement devices. Int Endod J. 2006 Aug 1;39(8):595–609. [6] Piasecki L, Carneiro E, da Silva Neto UX, Westphalen VPD, Brandão CG, Gambarini G, et al. The Use of Micro–Computed Tomography to Determine the Accuracy of 2 Electronic Apex Locators and Anatomic Variations Affecting Their Precision. J Endod. 2016 Aug 1;42(8):1263–7. [7] De Vasconcelos BC, Frota LMA, Souza TDA, Bernardes RA, Duarte MAH. Evaluation of the Maintenance of the Apical Limit during Instrumentation with Hybrid Equipment in Rotary and Reciprocating Modes. J Endod. 2015 May 1;41(5):682–5. [8] Jakobson SJM, Westphalen VPD, da Silva Neto UX, Fariniuk LF, Picoli F, Carneiro E. The Accuracy in the Control of the Apical Extent of Rotary Canal Instrumentation Using Root ZX II and ProTaper Instruments: An In Vivo Study. J Endod. 2008 Nov;34(11):1342–5. [9] Fadel G, Piasecki L, Westphalen VPD, Silva Neto UX, Fariniuk LF, Carneiro E. An in vivo evaluation of the Auto Apical Reverse function of the Root ZX II. Int Endod J. 2012 Oct 1;45(10):950–4. [10] Wigler R, Huber R, Lin S, Kaufman AY. Accuracy and reliability of working length determination by gold reciproc motor in reciprocating movement. J Endod. 2014 May 1;40(5):694–7. [11] Caviedes-Bucheli J, Castellanos F, Vasquez N, Ulate E, Munoz HR. The influence of two reciprocating single-file and two rotary-file systems on the apical extrusion of debris and its biological relationship with symptomatic apical periodontitis. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Endod J. 2016 Mar 1 ;49(3):255–70. [12] Siqueira JF. Microbial causes of endodontic flare-ups. Int Endod J. 2003 Jul 1 ;36(7):453–63. [13] Paqué F, Laib A, Gautschi H, Zehnder M. Hard-Tissue Debris Accumulation Analysis by High-Resolution Computed Tomography Scans. J Endod. 2009 Jul ;35(7):1044–7. [14] Paqué F, Rechenberg D-K, Zehnder M. Reduction of Hard-tissue Debris Accumulation during Rotary Root Canal Instrumentation by Etidronic Acid in a Sodium Hypochlorite Irrigant. J Endod. 2012 May 1;38(5):692–5. [15] Paqué F, Boessler C, Zehnder M. Accumulated hard tissue debris levels in mesial roots of mandibular molars after sequential irrigation steps. Int Endod J. 2011 Feb 1;44(2):148–53. [16] Myers GL, Montgomery S. A comparison of weights of debris extruded apically by conventional filing and canal master techniques. J Endod. 1991 Jun];17(6):275–9. [17] Tanalp J, Güngör T. Apical extrusion of debris: a literature review of an inherent occurrence during root canal treatment. Int Endod J. 2014 Mar;47(3):211–21. [18] Capar ID, Arslan H, Akcay M, Ertas H. An in vitro comparison of apically extruded debris and instrumentation times with protaper universal, protaper next, twisted file adaptive, and hyflex instruments. J Endod. 2014 Oct 1;40(10):1638–41. [19] Koçak MM, Çiçek E, Koçak S, Sa?lam BC, Yilmaz N. Apical extrusion of debris using protaper universal and protaper next rotary systems. Int Endod J 2015 Mar 1;48(3):283–6. [20] Bürklein S, Schäfer E. Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems. J Endod 2012 Jun;38(6):850–2. [21] Topçuo?lu HS, Zan R, Akpek F, Topçuo?lu G, Ulusan, Akt? A, et al. Apically extruded debris during root canal preparation using Vortex Blue, K3XF, ProTaper Next and Reciproc instruments. Int Endod J. 2016 Dec 1;49(12):1183–7.
Abstract: Introduction During the instrumentation phase, despite having a strict control of the working length, one of the main problems that can arise is the extrusion of residues and intracanal irrigants towards the periradicular tissues. Objective The aim of this study is to compare the amount of extruded dentin debris during instrumentation using a new endodontic motor in two different functions. Methods 24 extracted premolars were divided into two groups. The cameral access was performed using a # 4 carbide ball bur, all samples were decoronated to standardize the working length at 17 mm. The samples were instrumented with .06 taper Nickel-Titanium Vortex Blue rotary files (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) with an E-Connect S. endodontic motor in two of its functions: Slow down and rotary. For the collection of extruded debris, Eppendorf tubes were used, which were weighed individually. After instrumentation, the samples were stored in an incubator at 70 ° C for 5 days to evaporate the distilled water, product of the irrigation, and later the tubes were weighed again by the same scale to obtain the final weight of the tubes with the extruded debris. Results When comparing the weight in grams of the amount of debris extruded during instrumentation with two different functions of the E connect S endodontic motor, using Ni Ti rotary files, Vortex Blue, it was observed that the slow down function produces a lower amount of debris, however there were no statistically significant differences between both groups. Conclusion Both functions of the E connect S endodontic motor produce dentin debris, however, it was observed that in the slow down function, the amount of apical debris extrusion is slightly lower.

IJETSI is Member of