International Journal of Engineering Technology and Scientific Innovation
Submit Paper

Title:
BUILDING ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS THROUGH INTRINSIC MOTIVATION OF UNIVERSITY INSTRUCTORS

Authors:
Dr. Issam Atala; Safa Al-Asbahi

|| ||

Dr. Issam Atala; Safa Al-Asbahi
Lebanese International University- Lebanon

MLA 8
Atala, Dr. Issam, and Safa Al-Asbahi. "BUILDING ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS THROUGH INTRINSIC MOTIVATION OF UNIVERSITY INSTRUCTORS." IJETSI, vol. 4, no. 2, Mar.-Apr. 2019, pp. 103-121, ijetsi.org/more2019.php?id=9. Accessed Apr. 2019.
APA
Atala, D., & Al-Asbahi, S. (2019, March/April). BUILDING ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS THROUGH INTRINSIC MOTIVATION OF UNIVERSITY INSTRUCTORS. IJETSI, 4(2), 103-121. Retrieved from ijetsi.org/more2019.php?id=9
Chicago
Atala, Dr. Issam, and Safa Al-Asbahi. "BUILDING ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS THROUGH INTRINSIC MOTIVATION OF UNIVERSITY INSTRUCTORS." IJETSI4, no. 2 (March/April 2019), 103-121. Accessed April, 2019. ijetsi.org/more2019.php?id=9.

References
[1]. Adonis, J. (2006, August 29). Building better performance through intrinsic motivation. Retrieved May 27, 2016, from http://www.callcentrehelper.com/building-betterperformance-through-intrinsic-motivation-48.htm/comment-page-1#comment- 93085
[2]. Afful-Broni, A. (2012). Relationship between motivation and job performance at the University of Mines and Technology, Tarkwa, Ghana: Leadership Lessons. Creative Education, 3(03), 309.
[3]. Bowran J and Todd K 1999 Job stressor and job satisfaction in a major metropolitan public EMS service. Pre hospital and disaster medicine 14(4):236-239
[4]. Bryman, A. (2007). Effective leadership in higher education: a literature review. Studies in Higher Education, 32 (6), 693-710.
[5]. Cameron, K. (1986a). "A Study of Organizational Effectiveness and Its Predictors".Management Science, 32(1), 87-112.
[6]. Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M., & Ford, M. T. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 980-1008.doi:10.1037/a0035661
[7]. Clark, D.L., Lotto, L.S., Astuto, T.A. (1984). Effective School and School Improvement: A comparative Analysis of Two Lines of Inquiry. Educational Administration Quarterly, 20(3), 41-68.
[8]. Gawel, Joseph E. (1997). Herzberg's theory of motivation and maslow's hierarchy of needs. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 5(11). Retrieved May 27, 2016 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=5&n=11 .
[9]. Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70, 151- 179.doi:10.3102/00346543070002151
[10]. Houston, D., Meyer, L. H., & Paewai, S. (2006). Academic staff workloads and job satisfaction: Expectations and values in academe. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 28(1), 17-30.
[11]. House, R. J. (2004). Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
[12]. Malik, N. (2011). Study on job satisfaction factors of faculty members at university of Balochistan. International Journal of Academic Research, 3(1), 267-272.

Abstract:
Motivation of university instructors is a key component of incredible performance system in higher educational context. The main problem that university instructors in developing countries are facing nowadays is the lack of motivation. Since teaching requires excellent performance and commitment to achieve university effectiveness, the problem was considered major since it has lead to high turnover of university instructors that may hinder the success of a university. In this study the researcher investigated the importance of intrinsic motivation among the university instructors in Lebanon and Yemen. The main purpose of this descriptive-correlational study was to examine if career development, work itself and autonomy factors affect motivation and the sequence of importance of these factors for the university instructors of Lebanon and Yemen. A descriptive-correlative survey method was employed and data were collected through a questionnaire. The results that appeared showed that there is no significant difference in the preference of intrinsic motivation for university instructors in Yemen and Lebanon. It was found that university instructors think that these three factors are significant to make them more motivated to perform better but the sequence of importance was different between Lebanon and Yemen due to some factors such culture, environment and cost of living. It was recommended that universities should pay close attention especially to the intrinsic motivation (career development, autonomy, work itself, etc.) due to its great impact on the performance of university instructors more than the extrinsic motivation.

IJETSI is Member of